Archives

Indian Journal of Pure & Applied Biosciences (IJPAB)
Year : 2020, Volume : 8, Issue : 2
First page : (248) Last page : (252)
Article doi: : http://dx.doi.org/10.18782/2582-2845.8050

Growth and Productivity of Different Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Varieties as Influenced by Low Fertility with Two Irrigations in the Central Plains Zone

Narendar Kumar¹, Ashok Choudhary^2*, Sheilendra Kumar³ and Rajesh Sharma^4
1,4Sam Higginbottom Institute of Agriculture, Technology & Sciences, Allahabad-211007
^2,3Swami Keshwanand Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner 334006
*Corresponding Author E-mail: ashokagro777@gmail.com
Received: 14.03.2020  |  Revised: 17.04.2020   |  Accepted: 22.04.2020 

 ABSTRACT

A field experiment was conducted at crop research farm, Department of Agronomy, Allahabad School of Agriculture, Sam Higginbottom Institute of Agricultural, Technology & Sciences, Allahabad (U. P). It is on the near of the river Yamuna to study the varietal/Accession evaluation of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under low fertility & two irrigations during (Rabi) season 2012.  It was consisting of combination of nine varieties of Wheat. The field experiment was laid out in randomized block design with three replications. The results showed that number of plants per meter row length, plant height, number of tillers of per plant, number of grains per spike, grain and straw yield was recorded non significantly, whereas dry matter accumulation recorded significantly under treatment T1 (AAG-W-9) but it was at par with treatment T4 (AAG-W-9). Results further recorded that length of spike (11.04 cm) recorded significantly in treatment T4, where as test weight (41.23 g) recorded significantly higher in T3 (AAG-W-9) , which was statistically at par with T1 (PBW-343). The maximum grain yield (2.76 t/ha) and straw yield (6.40 t/ha) recorded in treatment T4 (AAG-W-6).

Keywords: Low fertility, Irrigation, Wheat

Full Text : PDF; Journal doi : http://dx.doi.org/10.18782

Cite this article: Kumar, N., Choudhary, A., Kumar, S., & Sharma, R. (2020). Growth and Productivity of Different Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Varieties as Influenced by Low Fertility with Two Irrigations in the Central Plains Zone, Ind. J. Pure App. Biosci.8(2), 248-252. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18782/2582-2845.8050

INTRODUCTION

Wheat is a staple food for nearly 38 percent of world’s population. This crop contributes 33 to 37 % of the national food grain production and will continue to play a crucial role in the food security of the country. Nutritional value of wheat is as good as other food grains comprising 71.2 gm Carbohydrate, 11-12 gm proteins, 1.5 gm fat, 1.2 gm. crude fiber, 306 mg phosphorous and 41 mg calcium per 100gm of grains (Rai & Mauria, 1999). During the year 2011-12, wheat was grown over an area of 29.9 m ha with a production of 94.8 m t and an average productivity of 3173 kg/ha (Anon., 2012). Uttar Pradesh is the maximum wheat producing state in India and Punjab has the best productivity. Wheat is grown in almost all the states in northern and central India. Wheat production in India has gone up to 80 million tonnes (2009-10). High yielding wheat varieties demand adequate nutrient supply to produce maximum grain yield (Ali & Yasin 1991). Varieties, however, respond differently to nutrient with respect to their genetic makeup and physiological life processes (Chandra et al., 1992).  Fertilizers play a pivotal role in increasing yield and improving the quality of crops. (Ali et al., 1997) Phosphorous application along with Nitrogen has a significant effect in increase the number of tillers, plant height, number of grains per spike, 1000-grain weight and grain yield.
As water for irrigation is a scarce resource, its use optimization is fundamental to water resource use. It permits better utilization of all other production factors and thus leads to increased yields per unit area and time. Efficient water management requires a thorough study of plant water relationship, climate, agronomic practices and economic assessment. Farmer, agronomist, economist and engineers need to know the response of yield to irrigation. Grain yield of different wheat cultivars have been found to be significantly reduced by water stress at all critical growth stages and greatest reduction was at anthesis stage (Jamal et al., 1996).
Since the time of green revolution numerous varieties have been developed with different response pattern to applied nutrients and irrigation frequency. It has been observed that recommended nutrient had been initially 100:60:40 kgs of NPK/ha respectively, which was later enhanced to 120:60:40 kgs NPK/ha respectively but the varieties failed in sustaining their yield. Therefore, the present recommendation has gone up to 150:80:60 kg of NPK/ha respectively. Thus, the ever increasing doses of nutrients are possing a serious economic consequence to farmers and they are reluctant to adopt such high doses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The experiment was conducted during the Rabi season 2012, at Crop Research Farm, Department of Agronomy, SHIATS, Allahabad (U.P.). The experimental farm is situated at 250 24 42 N latitude, 810 50 56 E longitude and at 98 meter altitude above mean sea level. This area is situated on the right side of the river Yamuna and by the side of Allahabad-Rewa Road 5 km away from Allahabad city. All the facilities, which are required for crop cultivation, are available. The mean maximum temperature varied between 38.850C and the minimum temperature varied between 6.50C during the Rabi season of 2012-13, as against the normal mean weekly relative humidity which was ranged from 38.14 to 89.14% received during the crop growing season. The soil is experimental plot was sandy loam in texture having pH of 7.60 with low level of organic carbon 0.39 %, available N (185.5 kg ha-1), available medium level of P (36 kg ha-1) and higher level of K (98 kg ha-1). The experiment was laid out randomized block design, comprising of nine combinations each replicated thrice. The treatments consisted of six varieties was developed by university and 3 was standard check varieties were taken. The varieties were PBW – 343, AAG-W-7, AAG-W-9, AAG-W-6, PB/W-550, AAG-W-4, AAG-W-8, AAG-W-10 and DBW-17.
Statistical analysis       
Data collected on different aspect of crop, viz., growth, yield attributes and yield were tabulated for statistical analysis (Fisher, 1950). Significance of difference between treatment means was tested through ‘F’ test and the critical difference (CD) was worked out wherever ‘F’ value was found to be significant for treatment effect. The analysis of variance for all the data have been given in appendix.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Growth attributes
Number of plants/meter row length: The table 1 indicates that the number of plants/ running row meter differed non significantly due to treatments. The maximum number of plants/ running row meter (28.53) was recorded in the treatment T2 (AAG-W-7), followed by treatments T9 (PBW-550) and T5 (DBW-17) respectively, whereas, the minimum number of plants/ running row meter (23.87) was recorded in the treatment T4 (AAG-W-6). The probable reasons for such finding might be due to varietal character.
Plant height (cm): The highest plant height (20.05 cm and 48.47 cm) at 30 DAS and 60 DAS was recorded in treatment T4 (AAG-W-6).The plant height of treatment T5 (PBW-550) were statistically at par with T4 (Table 1). However, plant height at 90 DAS the differences were non statistically significant. At 90 DAS highest plant height was recorded in treatment T4 (92.26 cm), while lowest (75.14 cm) was recorded in the case of T9 (DBW- 17). The probable reasons for the findings could have been because of varietal characteristics, all varieties recorded increased plant height by application of irrigation at all critical growth stage which might be due to the variation of genetic character among different varieties as well as with healthier plant growth with sufficient availability of nutrients having no moisture stress. These results are in line with those of Thompson and Chase (1992) who reported similar results.
Dry weight of plants (g): The dry weight of plants recorded non significant difference between the treatments in both of the observations recorded at 30 and 60 DAS.  At 30 DAS, treatment T5 (PBW-550) and T9 (DBW-17) recorded the highest value (5.00 g) for dry weight. At 60 DAS, treatment T2 (AAG-W-7) recorded the highest values (17.00 g) for dry weight, while lowest dry weight of plant (11.00 g) was recorded in the treatment T9. At 90 DAS the differences were statistically significant. At 90 DAS, treatment T1 (PBW-343) recorded the highest values (92.67 g) for dry weight, while lowest dry weight of plant (53.67 g) was recorded in the treatment T2 (AAG-W-7). The dry weight recorded under treatment T4, T7, T6   and T3 were statistically at par to that of T4 (AAG-W-6). The probable reasons for the findings could have been because of varietal characteristics, all varieties recorded increased dry weight of plant by application of irrigation at all critical growth stage which might be due to the variation of genetic character among different varieties as well as with healthier plant growth with sufficient availability of nutrients having no moisture stress. These results are in line with those of Sarwar et al. (2010).
Number of tillers per plants: The analysis of data recorded non significant difference in number of tillers per plant at 60 and 90 DAS. The highest number of tillers per plant (5.13) 60 DAS was recorded in the treatment T7 (AAG-W-8). The highest number of tillers per plant (3.53) 90 DAS was recorded in the treatment T6 (AAG-W-4) and T7 (AAG-W-8). While lowest (3.13, 2.20) at 60, 90 DAS were recorded under treatments T1 (PBW-343).The probable reasons for such finding might be due to varietal character.
Yield attributes and Yield
Length of spike (cm): The maximum length of spike (11.04 cm) was recorded in the treatment T4 (AAG-W-6) whereas, the minimum length of spike (7.73 cm) was recorded in the treatment T6 (AAG-W-4) (Table 2).The probable reasons for such findings might be due to varietal character. Timely sowing wheat crop took more days to complete its life-cycle with sufficient availability of moisture at seeding to physiological maturity. Shivani et al. (2001 and Verma et al. (1997) also reported similar findings.
Number of grains/spike: The higher number of grains spike-1 (48.07) was recorded in the treatment T7 (AAG-W-8). Treatments T2 (AAG-W-7) and T6 (AAG-W-6) were statistically at par to that of T7. It might be due to varietal character. Shivani et al. (2001) and Verma et al. (1997) also reported similar findings.
Test weight (g): The significantly highest test weight (41.23 g) was recorded in the treatment T3 (AAG-W-9) whereas, the minimum test weight (33.73 g) was recorded in the treatment T9 (DBW-17) .The test weight recorded under treatment T1 (PBW -343) was statistically at par to that of T3 (AAG-W-9). It was might be due to recommended NPK fertilizer dose and five irrigations provided to wheat which might have helped in more translocation of photosynthats towards grain due to the availability of sufficient amount of water in root zone. Similar results were recorded by Wajid et al. (2002) and Ali et al. (2000).
Grain yield (t/ha): The data (Table 2) indicates that the grain yield differed none significantly due to treatments. The maximum grain yield (2.76 t/ha) was recorded in the treatment T4 (AAG-W-6), followed by treatments T8 (AAG-W-10) and T7 (AAG-W-8) respectively, whereas, the minimum grain yield (1.72 t/ha) was recorded in the treatment T1 (PBW-343). The observation clearly depict that our varieties i.e., from treatment T2, T4, T6 and T7 performed at par to that of the recommended varieties for the region.
Straw yield (t/ha): The statistical analysis of the data indicates that the straw yield differs non significantly under different treatments. A critical review of the table reveals that the straw yield was higher (6.40 t/ha) under treatment T4 (AAG-W-6) while, the minimum straw yield (2.80 t/ha) was recorded under treatment T1 (PBW-343) and T9 (DBW-17).The probable reasons for such finding might be due to the different varieties performance at par with influence to the straw and grain yield.

Table 1: Effect of low fertility and two irrigations on growth attributes of different varieties of Wheat

Treatments		No. of plants /meter row length	Plant Height (cm)	Dry weight (g/plant)	Number of tillers/plant
T1	PBW – 343	24.40	77.81	92.67	3.13
T2	AAG-W-7	28.53	81.92	53.67	3.33
T3	AAG-W-9	25.07	88.08	78.67	4.00
T4	AAG-W-6	23.87	92.26	91.33	4.60
T5	PBW-550	26.53	83.49	73.00	3.67
T6	AAG-W-4	26.30	79.56	79.67	4.87
T7	AAG-W-8	26.40	83.79	80.67	5.13
T8	AAG-W-10	26.63	86.63	73.67	4.87
T9	DBW-17	26.53	75.14	71.00	3.53
F-test		NS	NS	S	NS
S.Ed (±)		2.27	4.96	7.08	2.82
C.D (P=0.05)		-	-	15.01	-

Table 2: Effect of low fertility and two irrigations on yield attributes yield of different varieties of Wheat

Treatments		Length of spike (cm)	No. of grains/ spike	Test weight (g)	Grain yield (t/ ha)	Straw yield (t/ha)
T1	PBW – 343	8.58	39.20	41.20	1.72	2.80
T2	AAG-W-7	8.55	47.93	36.50	2.56	3.35
T3	AAG-W-9	8.07	41.23	41.23	1.74	3.42
T4	AAG-W-6	11.04	44.07	36.90	2.76	6.40
T5	PBW-550	8.60	40.00	35.10	2.56	3.51
T6	AAG-W-4	7.73	47.27	35.13	2.46	3.86
T7	AAG-W-8	8.53	48.07	34.77	2.63	4.45
T8	AAG-W-10	9.11	39.73	36.90	2.64	4.02
T9	DBW-17	7.89	40.60	33.73	2.02	2.80
F-test		S	NS	S	NS	NS
S.Ed (±)		0.36	4.79	1.64	0.51.	1.09
C.D (P=0.05)		0.76	-	3.48	1.09	-

CONCLUSION

It may be concluded that among the varieties tried under low fertility and two irrigations accession variety AAG-W-6, was found to be the best for obtaining highest grain yield and benefit cost ratio in wheat. Since the findings are based on the research done in one season, it may be repeated for confirmation. 

REFERENCES

Ali, A., Malik, M.A., Ahmad, R., & Saifullah, (2000). Effect of various doses of nitrogen on the growth and yield of two wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivars. Pakistan. J. Biol. Sci., 3, 1004-5.
Ali, M., Abbas, G., Sharif, M., & Rehman, A. (1997). Effect of nitrogen along and in combination with phosphorus and potash on the yield and N content of wheat. J. Anim. Pl. Sci., 7, 81-3
Anonymous, (2008). Fully Revised Estimates of Principal Crops in India for the year 2007-08, Food Corporation of India.
Chandra, S., Varshncy, M.S., Sing, J., & Singh, S.K. (1992). Response of wheat varieties to different levels of nitrogen. Narendra Deva. J. Agric. Res. 7, 167–71.
Jamal, M., Nazir, M.S., Shah, S.H., & Nazir, A. (1996). Varietal response of wheat to water stress at different growth stages and effect on grain yield, straw yield, harvest index and protein contents in grains. Rachis. 15(1-2),   38-45
Rai, M., & Mauria, S. (1999). Coarse cereals, not for the poor alone. The Hindu Survey of Indian Agriculture 55-59.
Sarwar, N., Maqsood, M., Mubeen, K., Shehzad, M., Bhullar, M.S., Qamar, R., & Akbar, N. (2010). Effect of different levels of irrigation on yield and yield components of wheat cultivars. Pak. J. Agri. Sci. 47(3), 371-374
Shivani, Verma, U.N., Pal, S.K., Thakur, R., & Kumar, S. (2001). Production potential and water-use efficiency of wheat cultivars under different dates of seeding and irrigation levels.Indian J. Agron. 46(4), 659-664
Tewari, S.K., & Singh, M. (1993). Yielding ability of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) at different dates of sowing-a temperature dependent performance. Indian J. Agron.  38(2), 204-209.
Thompson, J.A., & Chase, D.L. (1992). Effect of limited irrigation on growth and yield of semi dwarf wheat in Southern New South Wales. (Field Crop Absts. 4721; 1994).     
Verma, U.N., Pal S.K., Singh, M.K., & Thakur, R. (1997). Fertilizer requirement of late sown wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under condition of Bihar plateau. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 68(5), 204-207.
Wajid, A., Hussain, A., Maqsood, M., Ahmad, A., & Awais, M. (2002). Influence of sowing date and irrigation levels on growth and grain yield of wheat. Pak. J. Agri. Sci. 39(1), 22-24.