INDIAN JOURNAL OF PURE & APPLIED BIOSCIENCES

ISSN (E) : 2582 – 2845

  • No. 772, Basant Vihar, Kota

    Rajasthan-324009 India

  • Call Us On

    +91 9784677044

Archives

Indian Journal of Pure & Applied Biosciences (IJPAB)
Year : 2020, Volume : 8, Issue : 3
First page : (306) Last page : (310)
Article doi: : http://dx.doi.org/10.18782/2582-2845.8112

Foliar Spray of Nutrients and Plant Growth Regulators on Nutrient Uptake, Productivity and Economics of Transplanted Finger Millet

A. Sathishkumar*, N. Sakthivel, E. Subramanian and P. Rajesh
Department of Agronomy, Agricultural College and Research Institute,
Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore - 641 003
*Corresponding Author E-mail: sathishkumar08668@gmail.com
Received: 19.04.2020  |  Revised: 23.05.2020   |  Accepted: 27.05.2020 

 ABSTRACT

Field experiment was conducted in Eastern block, Department of Farm Management, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore to study the effect of foliar application of nutrients and plant growth regulators on nutrient uptake, yield and economics of finger millet. The foliar spray treatment comprised of TNAU maize maxim 0.4%, TNAU maize maxim 0.5%, TNAU maize maxim 0.6%, DAP 2%, Boric acid 0.3%, Salicylic acid 40 ppm, Gibberellic acid 50 ppm and Control (no spray). Among the treatments, foliar spray of salicylic acid 40 ppm twice at pre and post flowering stage of crop growth significantly increased the nutrient uptake and yield. Foliar application of salicylic acid 40 ppm twice at pre and post flowering stage of crop growth also recorded higher values of net return (Rs. 41, 211 ha-1) and B:C ratio (2.48) ratio compared to other treatments. 

Keywords: Foliar spray, Economics, Nutrient uptake, Salicylic acid, Yield

Full Text : PDF; Journal doi : http://dx.doi.org/10.18782

Cite this article: Sathishkumar, A., Sakthivel, N., Subramanian, E., & Rajesh, P. (2020). Foliar Spray of Nutrients and Plant Growth Regulators on Nutrient Uptake, Productivity and Economics of Transplanted Finger Millet, Ind. J. Pure App. Biosci. 8(3), 306-310. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18782/2582-2845.8112

INTRODUCTION

Finger millet is nutritionally comparable and even superior to other cereals especially with respect to protective nutrient. It has eight to ten times more calcium (344 mg /100 g) than wheat and rice and contain a good amount of iron, phosphorous, thiamine and other nutrient, besides high calorific value, the slowly digestible carbohydrates make it a food for long sustenance. Hence, finger millet could play an important role to alleviate malnutrition and to enhance nutritional security that has turned fragile due to excessive dependence on few major food crops (Rashmi & Seetharam, 2004). The lower productivity of finger millet could be attributed to several factors such as its cultivation in marginal and poor soils, inadequate irrigation and poor management practices. Among these factors, one of the important reasons for poor yield of finger millet is its fertilization aspect. Foliar spray of nutrients and plant growth regulators are fastest way to boost up crop growth because the nutrients are available to plants at the initial stages and critical stages.
Foliar application of nutrients and growth regulators has been suggested for increasing the fertilizer use efficiency. It provides more rapid utilization of nutrients and permits the correction of observed deficiencies in less time than that would be required by soil treatments. Among the methods of fertilizer application, foliar nutrition is recognized as an important method of fertilization. Since foliar nutrients usually penetrate the leaf cuticle or stomata and enter the cells, it facilitates easy and rapid utilization of nutrients (Latha & Nandanasababady, 2003). Foliar nutrition is designed to eliminate the problems of fixation and immobilization of soil applied nutrients. Nutrients applied through foliage would be easily absorbed and translocated in the plant without any loss (Manivannan & Thanunathan, 2003). If foliar nutrition is applied, it reduces the amount of fertilizer which in turn reduces the cost of cultivation thereby economizing the crop production. Prabhakaran and Lourthuraj (2003) suggested that foliar application of fertilizers offers considerable scope not only for better utilization of nutrients but also for the economy of fertilizer application. Keeping these views in mind, the present investigation was carried out to study the effect of foliar spray of nutrients and plant growth regulators on productivity and economics of transplanted finger millet.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Field experiment was conducted during rabi 2013-14 in Eastern block, Department of Farm Management, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore to find out the effect of foliar spray of nutrients and plant growth regulators on growth and yield of irrigated finger millet (Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn). The soil of the experimental field was sandy clay loam in texture, low in available nitrogen (219.3 kg ha-1), medium in available phosphorus  (15.2 kg ha-1) and high in available potassium (390.7 kg ha-1) with pH 8.2 and 0.66% organic carbon. The experiment was conducted on Variety CO 13, comprising of eight treatments viz., T1 – Maize maxim 0.4% (2 kg ha-1), T2 – Maize maxim 0.5% (2.5 kg ha-1), T3 – Maize maxim 0.6% (3 kg ha-1), T4 – DAP 2% (10 kg ha-1), T5 – Boric acid 0.3% (1.5 kg ha-1), T6 – Salicylic acid 40 ppm (20 g ha-1), T7 – Gibberellic acid 50 ppm (25 g ha-1) and T8 – Control (no spray) was laid out in Randomized Block Design (RBD) replicated thrice. The recommended dose of 60: 30: 30 kg N, P2O5 and K2O ha-1 was applied in the form of Urea (46% N), Single super phosphate (16% P2O5) and Muriate of potash (60 % K2O).  As per the recommendation, basal application of 30: 30: 30 kg N, P2O5 and K2O5 ha-1 was applied uniformly to all plots at the time of transplanting and the remaining dose of 30 kg N ha-1 was applied at 45 days after transplanting. Foliar application of nutrients and plant growth regulators was applied twice at pre and post flowering stage of crop growth. Tamil Nadu Agricultural University has developed “Maize Maxim”, a nutrient mixture (major, micro nutrients and growth regulators) to boost maize yield. Keeping this in view, the TNAU maize maxim was also included in the present investigation.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Nutrient uptake
Nutrient status is an important and deciding factor in judging the total dry matter accumulation in plants. Nutrient uptake thus may minimize the nutrient depletion in the leaves. Due to this, photosynthesis in the leaves will be maintained at a higher level resulting in increased yield. All the foliar spray treatments showed significant variation in the uptake of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (Table 1 and 2). Application of salicylic acid 40 ppm twice at pre and post flowering stage of crop growth (T6) recorded higher nitrogen (54.6 and 71.5 kg/ha), phosphorus (12.23 and 15.64 kg/ha) and potassium uptake (51.3 and 65.4 kg/ha) at 60 DAT and at harvest, respectively. This was followed by foliar application of gibberellic acid 50 ppm twice (T7). The lowest nutrient uptake was recorded with control (T8). Foliar application of nutrients and plant growth regulators has shown better effect on nutrient uptake. Foliar spray of salicylic acid at 40 ppm increased the nutrient uptake of N, P and K which might be due to effective translocation of nutrients from source to sink. Higher concentration of nutrients in seed along with higher seed yield under foliar spray of salicylic acid resulted in higher uptake of nutrients in mungbean (Nafees et al., 2010). This result corroborates the findings of Uma Devi (1998) in sesame and Arjun (2001) in soybean. Sritharan et al. (2005) observed in grain legumes that the application of PGRs and nutrients decrease the leaf senescence by retaining more leaf nitrogen and chlorophyll.
Grain yield
Spraying of foliar nutrients and growth regulators had significant influence on grain yield of finger millet (Table 2). The plant sprayed with salicylic acid at 40 ppm (T6) produced significantly higher grain yield of 3593 kg ha-1. This was followed by foliar application of gibberellic acid at 50 ppm (T7) and this was on par with TNAU maize maxim at 0.6% (T3) with grain yield of 3397 and 3319 kg ha-1, respectively. Significantly lower yield of 2709 kg ha-1 was observed with control (T8). This might be due to enhancement of growth attributing characters like plant height, dry matter production and number of tillers m-2 and yield attributing characters like number of productive tillers m-2, ear head weight and also the nutrient uptake by finger millet. Dawood et al. (2012) observed that increase in kernel yield and yield components of sunflower by salicylic acid were due to the effect of physiological and biochemical processes that led to ameliorate in vegetative growth, active assimilation and translocation from source to sink.
Straw yield
Application of foliar spray exhibited significant influence on straw yield also (Table 2). Salicylic acid at 40 ppm (T6) recorded the higher straw yield of 8735 kg ha-1. The lower straw yield (7436 kg ha-1) was recorded with control (T8). The straw yield enhancement due to the adoption of different treatments might be due to continuous supply of nutrients which in turn increased the plant height, dry matter production and number of tillers m-2 resulting in higher straw yield. This is also attributed due to the higher nutrient uptake throughout the crop growth period. The results of the present study were in confirmation with the finding of Amin et al. (2008) in straw yield of wheat.
Economics
The economics such as cost of cultivation, gross return, net return and B:C ratio of finger millet due to foliar application of nutrients and plant growth regulators were calculated and presented in Table 3. Foliar spray was found to alter the gross return, net return and benefit cost ratio. Gross return (Rs. 69, 047/ha) and net return (Rs. 41, 211/ha) were higher with the foliar spray of salicylic acid 40 ppm twice at pre and post flowering stage of crop growth (T6). The next best treatment was the application of gibberellic acid 50 ppm twice at pre and post flowering stage of crop growth (T7), with gross return of Rs. 65, 314/ha and net return of Rs. 34, 519/ha). The control (T8) recorded the lower gross return (Rs. 52, 486/ha) and net return (Rs. 25, 811/ha). With respect to B:C ratio, the foliar application of salicylic acid 40 ppm twice at pre and post flowering stage of crop growth (T6) registered the higher B:C ratio (2.48). The foliar spray of TNAU maize maxim 0.6% twice at pre and post flowering stage of crop growth recorded the next higher B:C ratio (2.20) and the lowest B:C ratio (1.97) was recorded under control (T8). This might be due to the higher yield of finger millet recorded under this treatment and also lower level of cost of cultivation compared to the other treatments. Sujatha (2001) reported that foliar application of salicylic acid improved the B:C ratio in greengram. Similar result was also reported by Arjun (2001) in soybean.
It is evident from the present investigation that, the overall performance of the crop in terms of nutrient uptake, yield and economics were higher with salicylic acid 40 ppm spray twice at pre and post flowering stage of crop growth. The study has clearly indicated that foliar application of salicylic acid 40 ppm twice at pre and post flowering stage of crop growth along with recommended dose of fertilizer would be an ideal practice for getting higher yield and economic returns in finger millet.

Table 1: Effect of foliar spray on the nitrogen and phosphorus uptake (kg/ha) of finger millet

Treatment

Nitrogen

Phosphorus

60 DAT

Harvest

60 DAT

Harvest

T1  - TNAU maize maxim 0.4% (2 kg/ha)

47.5

58.5

9.35

11.36

T2  - TNAU maize maxim 0.5% (2.5 kg/ha)

49.1

62.4

10.25

12.76

T3  - TNAU maize maxim 0.6% (3 kg/ha)

51.9

67.0

11.00

13.93

T4  - DAP 2% (10 kg/ha)

47.7

58.9

9.68

11.65

T5  - Boric acid 0.3% (1.5 kg/ha)

48.4

61.3

10.03

12.45

T6  - Salicylic acid 40 ppm (20 g/ha)

54.6

71.5

12.23

15.64

T7  - Gibberellic acid 50 ppm (25 g/ha)

52.3

68.1

11.19

14.20

T8 - Control (no spray)

44.3

54.7

8.11

9.90

SEd

0.9

1.1

0.39

0.40

CD (p=0.05)

2.8

3.2

0.84

0.86

Table 2: Effect of foliar spray on the potassium uptake, grain yield, and straw yield (kg/ha) of finger millet

Treatment

Potassium

Grain yield

Straw yield

60 DAT

Harvest

T1  - TNAU maize maxim 0.4% (2 kg/ha)

44.1

55.5

2945

7760

T2  - TNAU maize maxim 0.5% (2.5 kg/ha)

47.0

59.7

3200

7996

T3  - TNAU maize maxim 0.6% (3 kg/ha)

49.3

61.6

3319

8270

T4  - DAP 2% (10 kg/ha)

44.5

56.5

2977

7826

T5  - Boric acid 0.3% (1.5 kg/ha)

46.6

58.3

3078

7874

T6  - Salicylic acid 40 ppm (20 g/ha)

51.3

65.4

3593

8735

T7  - Gibberellic acid 50 ppm (25 g/ha)

49.8

62.2

3397

8344

T8 - Control (no spray)

41.7

52.8

2709

7436

SEd

0.6

1.0

87

140

CD (p=0.05)

1.3

2.1

187

300

Table 3: Effect of foliar spray on the economics of finger millet

Treatment

Cost of cultivation
(Rs./ha )

Gross return
(Rs./ha )

Net return
(Rs./ha )

Benefit cost
ratio

T1  - TNAU maize maxim 0.4% (2 kg/ha)

28615

56892

28277

1.99

T2  - TNAU maize maxim 0.5% (2.5 kg/ha)

28815

61598

32783

2.14

T3  - TNAU maize maxim 0.6% (3 kg/ha)

29015

63882

34867

2.20

T4  - DAP 2% (10 kg/ha)

28315

57497

29182

2.03

T5  - Boric acid 0.3% (1.5 kg/ha)

28079

59341

31262

2.11

T6  - Salicylic acid 40 ppm (20 g/ha)

27836

69047

41211

2.48

T7  - Gibberellic acid 50 ppm (25 g/ha)

30795

65314

34519

2.12

T8 - Control (no spray)

26675

52486

25811

1.97

REFERENCES

Amin, A.A., Rashad, E.M., Fatma. & Gharib, A.E. (2008). Changes in Morphological, Physiological and Reproductive Characters of Wheat. Australian Journal Basic & Applied Sciences. 2, 252-261.
Arjun Singh Rana (2001). Effect of organic manures and foliar spray of nutrients and growth regulators on growth and yield of soybean (Glycine max (L) Merill). M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis. Tamil Nadu agricultural University, Coimbatore. 
Dawood, M.G., Sadak, M.S., &  Hozayen, M. (2012). Physiological role of salicylic acid in improving performance, yield and some biochemical aspects of sunflower plant grown under newly reclaimed sandy soil. Australian Journal Basic & Applied Sciences. 6, 82-89.
Nafees, A.K., Shabina, S., Asim, M., Rahat, N., & Noushina, I. (2010). Application of salicylic acid increases contents of nutrients and antioxidative metabolism in mungbean and alleviates adverse effects of salinity stress. International Journal of Plant Biology. 1, e 1.
Sritharan, Anitha Aravazhi, Mallika., & Vanangamudi. (2005). Effect of foliar spray of nutrients and plant growth regulators (PGRS) for yield maximization in blackgram. Madras Agricultural Journal. 92,301-307.
Sujatha, K.B. (2001). Effect of foliar spray of chemicals and bioregulators on growth and yield of greengram (Vigna radiata L.). M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis. Tamil Nadu Agric. Univ., Coimbatore.
Uma devi, T.K. (1998). Studies on physiological basis of partitioning and its regulation for maximising yield in sesame (Sesamum indicum L.). M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, Tamil Nadu agricultural University, Coimbatore. 
Prabhakharan, N.K., & Lourthuraj, C.A. (2003). Nutrient management in soybean - A review.Agricultural Reviews. 24, 223-228.
Manivannan, V., & Thanunathan, K. (2003). Effect of foliar nutrition of major and chelated micronutrients and rhizobium seed treatment on rice-fallow blackgram. Madras Agricultural Journal. 90, 344-347.
Latha, M.R., & Nadanasababady, T. (2003). Foliar nutrition in crops-A Review. Agricultural Reviews. 24, 229-234.




Photo

Photo