INDIAN JOURNAL OF PURE & APPLIED BIOSCIENCES

ISSN (E) : 2582 – 2845

  • No. 772, Basant Vihar, Kota

    Rajasthan-324009 India

  • Call Us On

    +91 9784677044

Archives

Indian Journal of Pure & Applied Biosciences (IJPAB)
Year : 2021, Volume : 9, Issue : 2
First page : (159) Last page : (166)
Article doi: : http://dx.doi.org/10.18782/2582-2845.8216

INM method for Sweet Corn Hybrid on Soil Biology

A. Bharathi1*, M. Balusamy2, E. Somasundaram3 and R. Shanmugasundaram4
1Assistant Professor, School of Agriculture and Horticulture, Kalasalingam Academy of Research and Education, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar - 626126, TN, India
2,3Professor, Department of Agronomy, 4Professor,
Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, AC & RI, TNAU, Coimbatore-641003, TN, India
*Corresponding Author E-mail: mailmebharathia@gmail.com
Received: 28.12.2020 | Revised: 30.01.2021 | Accepted: 7.02.2021 

 ABSTRACT

An experiment was conducted during rabi 2014-2015 on clay loam soil at irrigated upland farms of Eastern block, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore to study the effect of integrated nitrogen management of sweet corn hybrid on certain soil biological properties. The experiment was replicated thrice, with 12 treatments comprising integration of organic manures viz., FYM, vermicompost, poultry manure, goat manure and biogas slurry at 2 levels (25 and 50 percent) with inorganic N at 75 and 50 per cent. The remaining two treatments were 100 per cent N as inorganic fertilizer and 100 per cent N as inorganic fertilizers with 12.5 t ha-1 of FYM. The microbial population and Urease, Dehydrogenase and Phosphatase activity in the soil at different growth stages of sweet corn hybrid by adopting standard procedure. The soil micro flora and enzymatic activity were found greater due to application of 50 per cent N as biogas slurry with 50 per cent N as inorganic. However, it was comparable with 50 per cent N as vermicompost + 50 per cent N as inorganic and 50 per cent N as FYM + 50 per cent N as inorganic. The 100 per cent N applied plot as inorganic registered lesser microbial load and soil enzymatic activity.

Keywords: Soil microbial population, Urease, Dehydrogenase and Phosphatase activity.

Full Text : PDF; Journal doi : http://dx.doi.org/10.18782

Cite this article: Bharathi, A., Balusamy, M., Somasundaram, E., & Shanmugasundaram, R. (2021). INM method for Sweet Corn Hybrid on Soil Biology, Ind. J. Pure App. Biosci. 9(2), 159-166. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18782/2582-2845.8216

INTRODUCTION

Sweet corn (Zea mays L. sub sp. saccharata) is consumed as human food in soft dough stage with succulent, sweet, creamy, tender, and crispy kernels, which tastes almost shell-less. The higher content of water soluble polysaccharide in the kernel adds texture and quality to sweetness (Venkatesh et al., 2003). Its demand in amusement parks, theatres, circus and exhibition is increasing with increasing urban population not only in India (Sahoo & Mahapatra, 2007) but in international markets (Kumar, 2008).

This created an increasing tendency for commercial production. Unlike maize, sweet corn is also an energy rich crop, so its productivity largely depends upon nutrient management practices. Non availability of chemical fertilizers in time and their higher cost are the reasons for creates an imbalance in the soil. To sustain the soil health and provide adequate plant nutrition, it is about the plant nutrient sources other than the chemical fertilizers and their application in integration (Singh et al., 2009). Use of organic manures along with inorganic fertilizers not only reduces the demand of inorganic fertilizers, but also, increases the efficiency of applied nutrients due to favourable effect on physical, chemical and biological properties of soil (Prasad et al.,1992). The effectiveness of integrated nutrient management practice can depend on season, soil type, climate, water management, variety and cropping pattern.
Microbes and enzymes in soil are biologically significant as they are involved in the transformation, cycling of mineral nutrients and influence nutrient availability to plants. The addition of soil enzymes is influenced by the nature, age of crop and addition of manures and fertilizers. The enzyme activity is considered as the index of microbial and physic-chemical conditions of soil in relation to nutrient availability (Aon & Colaneri, 2001). Available NPK and organic carbon content have a positive relationship with all the enzymes and soil microbes. Organic source of NPK fertilization enhanced the activities of the soil enzymes and the effect was more pronounced with organic manures when combined with inorganic chemical fertilizers (Singaram & Kamalakumari, 1996 & Reddy, 2002).
Soil microorganisms and soil enzyme activities, is enhanced by their eco-environment, can sense minute changes. Soil urease showed a close relation with urea hydrolysis and increases the utilization rate of nitrogen. The enzyme dehydrogenase on the other hand is involved in simplification of carbohydrates, proteins and lipids. This study is planned to investigate the effect of integrated nitrogen management on soil microbial load and soil enzymes viz., Urease, Dehydrogenase and Phosphatase activity at different stages of sweet corn hybrid.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The field experiment was carried out during rabi 2014-15 at irrigated upland farm of Eastern block, Tamil Nadu Agriculture University, Coimbatore which is situated at11o N latitude and 77o E longitude with an altitude of 426.74 meters above mean sea level. The soil of the experimental field was clay loam, alkaline in reaction (pH: 8.6), non saline (EC: 0.28 dSm-1), medium in organic carbon (0.46 %) and low available nitrogen (208 kg ha-1), medium available phosphorus (18 kg ha-1) and high available potassium (415 kg ha-1) in the plough layer. The details of the soil characteristics are furnished in Table 1.

Table 1: Soil characteristics of the field at the inception of experiment

 

Particulars

Values

Method

Author(s)

Textural composition (Moisture free basis)

 

Clay (%)

29.15

Robinson’s international pipette method

Piper (1966)

 

Silt (%)

17.42

 

Coarse sand (%)

23.10

 

Fine sand (%)

30.33

 

Texture

Clay loam

Chemical composition

 

Available N (kg ha-1)

208
(Low)

Alkaline permanganate method

Subbiah and Asija (1956)

 

Available P2O5 (kg ha-1)

18
(Medium)

Olsen method

Olsen et al. (1954)

 

Available K2O (kg ha-1)

415
(High)

Neutral normal ammonium acetate method

Stanford and English (1949)

 

Organic carbon (%)

0.36

Chromic acid wet  digestion method

Walkley and Black (1934)

Microbial population

 

Total bacteria                        (CFU x 106 g -1 soil)

10

Nutrient agar

Collings and Lyne (1968)

 

Total fungi                             (CFU x 103 g -1 soil)

6

Martin`s rose Bengal agar

Martin(1950)

 

Total actinomycetes                 (CFU x 104  g -1 soil)

12

Ken Knight`s medium

Kenknight and Muncie (1939)

Soil enzymatic activity

 

Urease                                           ( µg NH4+  g-1 soil 24 h-1)

22.80

Urea hydrolysis in soil

Tabatabai (1982)

 

Dehydrogenase                                                  ( µg TPF g-1 soil 24 h-1)

3.1

Spectrophotometer at 485 nm

Casida et al. (1964)

 

Phosphatase ( µg p-nitrophenol  g-1 soil 24 h-1)

18.65

Spectrophotometer at 420 nm

Halstead (1964)

 

Field experiment was laid out in randomized block design with 12 treatments and replicated thrice. The treatments include, T1 (25% N as FYM + 75% N as inorganics), T2 (25% N as vermicompost + 75% N as inorganics), T3 (25% N as poultry manure + 75% N as inorganics), T4 (25% N as goat manure + 75% N as inorganics), T5 (25% N as biogas slurry + 75% N as inorganics), T6 (50% N as FYM + 50% N as inorganics), T7 (50% N as vermicompost + 50% N as inorganics), T8 (50% N as poultry manure + 50% N as inorganics), T9 (50% N as goat manure + 50% N as inorganics), T10 (50% N as biogas slurry + 50% N as inorganics), T11 (100% N as inorganic) and T12 (100% N as inorganic + FYM @ 12.5 t ha-1) which is the recommended practice and fixed as bench mark.
The recommended dose of fertilizer was applied as N: P2O5: K2O @ 120:60:45 kg ha-1. Based on N equal basis required quantities of organic manures were incorporated in the soil one week before sowing. P and K requirements of the crop were applied separately as fertilizer. All the package of practices was carried out as per recommendation of CPG (2012). 
The microbial population in the soil at different growth stages of the crop was determined by serial dilution plate count method. Soil samples from different treatments were collected separately replication wise. Ten gram of soil (treatment wise) was mixed in 90 ml sterilized water blank to give 10-1 dilutions. Subsequent dilutions upto 10-6 were made by transferring serially one ml of each dilution to nine ml sterilized water blanks. The population of bacteria, fungi and actinomycetes were estimated by serial dilution and plate count technique by plating on appropriate media viz., Nutrient agar, Martins rose Bengal agar media and Kenknights agar media, respectively. The inoculated plates were kept for incubation at 30oC ± 1 oC and emerged colonies were counted. The incubation time varied based on the microorganisms. Microbial population was expressed as colony forming units (CFU) g-1 of the soil. This method was suggested by Jensen (1968).

       

The enzyme activity was determined at post-harvest stages of sweet corn.
The substrates and methods followed for enzyme assays as shown in Table 2.

Table 2: Standard methods followed for soil enzyme analysis


S.No.

Enzyme

Substrate

Reference

1

Urease

Urea solution (10%)

Tabatabai (1982)

2.

Dehydrogenase

2,3,5-Triphenyl tetrazolium chloride

Casida et al. (1964)

3.

Phosphatase

p-nitrophenol phosphate

Halstead (1964)

 

The data recorded on various parameters recorded during the course of investigation was statistically analysed as per the procedures suggested by Gomez and Gomez (1984) for randomized block design. Wherever the treatmental difference were found significant (‘F’ test), critical difference was worked out at 0.05 probability level. Treatmental differences that were non-significant were denoted by ‘NS’.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Microbial load
The influence of organic and inorganic sources of nutrients on the soil biological properties is studied through the assessment of soil microbial population. Application of different organic and inorganic sources of nutrients significantly energized the soil microbial load during the crop growth period (Figure 1, 2 & 3). The fluctuation in the microbial load in the soil is based on the availability of carbon source in the soil and enhanced microbial activity stimulated by organic manures (Hoflich et al., 2000). Higher population of soil microbes under organic added treatments acted as an index of soil fertility because it serves as temporary sink of nutrients flux.
Among the integrated treatments, application of 50 per cent N as biogas slurry + 50 per cent N as inorganic (T10) had higher influence on the population of bacteria, fungi and actinomycetes which is closely related to of 50 per cent N as FYM  + 50 per cent N as inorganic (T6). This is due to higher organic carbon content of the soil, so this helped to increase the soil microflora. Biogas slurry used as organic manure enhanced the soil microbial population at half substitution with inorganic fertilizer (Sankaran et al., 1981).
The soil microbes continue to increase with the advancement of crop growth due to enhanced organic carbon content of the soil as a result of organic manure addition as compared to sole inorganic fertilizers application (Krishnakumar et al., 2007).
The lower soil microbial load was found in 100 per cent N through inorganic fertilizer applied plots which might be due to inhibitory nature of chemical fertilizers on the growth and development of microbes (Singh, 1998; & Yadav & Lourduraj, 2007). Higher concentration of exchangeable and soluble Al3+ ion, under the chemical fertilizer treatment might have created a deleterious impact on soil acidity on microorganisms, which in turn reduced the microbial population (Swain et al., 2013).
Enzymatic activity
Urease activity:
Changes in the soil enzyme activities at different crop growth stages is presents in Table: 3. Soil urease activity ascended gradually with sweet corn growth and reached highest value during 60 DAS then after it decreased.  The soil fertilized with the recommended level released 47.2 µg NH4+ g-1 soil 24 h-1 at 60 DAS. Among the integrated treatments application of 50 per cent N as biogas slurry + 50 per cent N as inorganic (T10) reported 42.9, 46.5 and 40.2 µg NH4+  g-1 soil 24 h-1 at 30, 60 DAS and at harvest respectively, this is on par with T6, T7 and T9. Balanced nutrition of crop, responsible for better proliferation of root (rhizosphere) was responsible the maximum activity of enzymes. These results are in conformity with trends reported by various workers (Srilatha et al., 2013; Vilasitha et al., 2013 & Rai & Yadav, 2011).
Dehydrogenase activity:
The dehydrogenase activity of the soil showed that it released 3.1 µg of TPF released g-1 soil 24 h-1 of soil before the commencement of the experiment. The dehydrogenase activity accelerated substantially by the integrated nutrient management treatments. Application of 50 per cent N as biogas slurry + 50 per cent N as inorganic (T10) reported 3.8, 6.1 and 2.9 1 µg of TPF released g-1 soil 24 h-1 of soil at 30, 60 DAS and at harvest respectively, which is in par with T6, T7 and T9. A sharp increase in dehydrogenase activity found to coincide with 60 DAS, so it enhanced root growth and the relase of cellular enzyme like dehydrogenase activity to the soil solution. These results are in consonance with the finding of Srilatha et al. (2013) and Reddy and Reddy (2012).
Phosphotase activity:

The phosphatase activity showed that the initial sample released 18.65 µg p-nitrophenol g-1 soil 24 h-1. The soil fertilized with recommended level released 42.60 µg p-nitrophenol g-1 soil 24 h-1at 60 DAS. Among the integrated treatments application of 50 per cent N as biogas slurry + 50 per cent N as inorganic (T10) reported 38.20, 41.8 and 35.20 µg p-nitrophenol g-1 soil 24 h-1 at 30, 60 DAS and at harvest stage respectively which is in par with T6, T7 and T9. Increasing level of phosphatase known to improve growth and development of roots which in turn release the enzymes in larger quantities (Pallab et al., 1990). The additional advantage of INM in improvement in biological activity was probably due to addition of organic manures in the integrated nutrient management treatments that serve as a source of increased microbial activity which exude the enzyme and through better soil aggregation and other process (Singaram & Kamalakumar, 1995 & Vilasitha et al., 2013).

Table 3: Effect of integrated nutrient management practices on soil enzyme activity


Treatments

Urease activity
(µg NH4+  g-1 soil 24 h-1)

Dehydrogenase activity
(µg of TPF released g-1 soil  24 h-1)

Phosphatase activity
(µg of p-nitrophenol released g-1 soil 24 h-1)

30 DAS

60 DAS

Harvest

30 DAS

60 DAS

Harvest

30 DAS

60 DAS

Harvest

T1 – 25% N as FYM + 75% N as inorganic

39.5

43.1

36.8

3.5

5.8

2.6

34.7

38.3

31.3

T2 – 25% N as vermicompost + 75% N as inorganic

37.6

41.2

34.9

3.1

5.4

2.2

32.4

36.0

28.9

T3 – 25% N as poultry manure + 75% N as inorganic

38.5

42.1

35.8

3.3

5.6

2.4

34.4

38.0

29.8

T4 – 25% N as goat manure + 75% N as inorganic

37.9

41.5

35.2

3.1

5.4

2.2

34.2

37.8

30.0

T5 – 25% N as biogas slurry + 75% N as inorganic

39.0

42.6

36.3

3.4

5.7

2.5

34.5

38.1

30.2

T6 – 50% N as FYM + 50% N as inorganic

42.6

46.2

36.3

3.8

6.1

2.9

36.4

40.0

32.8

T7 – 50% N as vermicompost + 50% N as inorganic

41.7

45.3

39.0

3.7

6.0

2.8

35.6

39.2

31.2

T8 – 50% N as poultry manure + 50% N as inorganic

40.3

43.9

37.6

3.5

5.8

2.6

34.9

38.5

30.9

T9 – 50% N as goat manure + 50% N as inorganic

41.1

44.7

38.4

3.6

5.9

2.7

35.2

38.8

31.4

T10 – 50% N as biogas slurry + 50% N as inorganic

42.9

46.5

40.2

3.8

6.1

2.9

38.2

41.8

35.2

T11 – 100% N as inorganic

35.0

38.6

32.2

2.0

4.3

1.1

24.0

27.6

21.3

T12 – 100% N as inorganic + 12.5 t ha-1 FYM 

43.6

47.2

40.9

4.0

6.3

3.1

39.0

42.6

35.3

SEd

0.2

1.2

0.8

0.2

0.3

0.1

1.2

1.8

0.5

CD (P=0.05)

0.4

2.6

1.7

0.4

0.5

0.3

2.5

3.8

1.1

 

CONCLUSION

Microbial population (bacteria, fungi and actinomycetes) and enzymatic
(urease, dehydrogenase and phosphatase) activity of the soil were positively influenced due to application of 50 per cent N as biogas slurry in combination with 50 per cent N as inorganic fertilizers. Among the different INM treatments, higher biological property was recorded with half substitution of organic manures with inorganic fertilizer which resulted in buildup of soil organic carbon content at the end of cropping period.

REFERENCES

Aon, M. A., & Colaneri, A. C. (2001). Temporal and spatial evaluation of enzymatic activities and physico-chemical properties in an agricultural soil. App. Soil Ecology., 18, 255 -270.
Casida, L. E., Jr., Klein, D. A., & Santoro, T. (1964). Soil dehydrogenase acitivity. Soil Sci., 98, 371-376.
Collings, C. H., & Lyne, M. P. (1968). Microbiological methods. 5th Edition, Butter Worth, London.
CPG, Crop production guide. Published by Directorate of Agri., Chennai and TNAU, Coimbatore, India (2012).
Gomez, K. A., & Gomez, A. A. (1984). Statistical procedure for agricultural research. John Wiley and Sons, New York. pp. 680.
Halstead, R. L. (1964). Phosphatase activity of soils as influenced by lime and other treatments. Can. J. Soil Sci., 44, 137-144.
Hoflich, G., Tauschke, M., Kuhn, G., & Rogasik, J. (2000). Influence of agricultural crops and fertilization on microbial activity and micro organisms in the rhizosphere. J. Agron. Crop Sci., 184, 49-54.
Jensen, V. (1968). The plate count method. In: The ecology of soil bacteria: An International Symposium (eds.) T.R.G. Gray and D. Parkinsons, Liverpool University Press, Liverpool: 158-170.
Kenknight, G., & Muncie, J. H. (1939). Isolation of phytopathogenic actinomyctetes. Phytopathology, 29, 1000-1001.
Krishnakumar, S., Saravanan, A., Rajesh, V., & Mayil Samy, A. (2007). Impact of organic farming on biological properties of rice (Oryza sative) grown soil. J. Ecobiol., 20(3), 275-280.
Kumar, A. (2008). Productivity, economics and nitrogen use efficiency of specialty corn (Zea mays L.) as influenced by planting density and nitrogen fertilization. Indian J. Agron., 53(4), 306-309.
Martin, J. P. (1950). Use of acid, rose Bengal and Streptomycin in the plate method for estimating soil fungi. Soil Sci., 69, 215-233.
Olsen, S. R., Cole, C. V., Watanabe, F. S., & Dean, A. L. (1954). Estimation of available phosphorous in soils by extraction on with sodium bicarbonate circular no: 939, USDA.
Pallab, K. D., Arun Mishra, K., & De, S. K. (1990). Soil enzyme activities and agricultural importance. Indian J. of Agri Chem, 29, 223-227.
Piper, C. S. (1966). Soil and Plant Analysis. Inter Science Publications. New York.
Prasad, R., Sharma, S. N., Singh, S., & Lakshmanan, K. Agronomic practices for increasing nitrogen use efficiency and sustained crop production. In: Abstracts of National Symposium for “Resource management for sustained production”, 25-28 February, Indian society of agronomy. Rajasthan Agricultural University. pp. 8 (1992).
Rai, T. N., & Yadav, J. (2011). Influence of inorganic and organic nutrient sources on soil enzyme activities. J of the Indian Society of Soil Sci. 59(1), 54-59.
Reddy, M. S. (2002). Relationship between organic carbon and soil enzymes. The J. Res. ANGRAU., 30(2), 143-146.
Reddy, R. U., & Reddy, M. S. (2012). Influence of integrated nutrient management on dehydrogenase activity of soil in tomato-onion cropping system. J of Res., ANGRAU. 40(2), 15-19.
Sahoo, S. C., & Mahapatra, P. K. (2007). Yield and economics of sweet corn (Zea mays L.) as affected by plant population and fertility levels during rabi season. Indian J. Agron., 53(3), 239-242.
Sankaran, K., Kothandaraman, G. V., & Manickam, T. S. (1981). Comparative study of biodigested slurry as source of organic plant nutrient. TNAU, Coimbatore (presented in a seminar in microbiology of biogas fermentation).
Singaram, P., & Kamalakumari, K. (1996). Effect of continuous application of FYM and NPK on fertility status, yield and nutrient uptake in maize. Madras Agric. J., 83(2), 181-184.
Singh, C. P. (1998). Preparation of high grade compost by an enrichment technology. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 4, 12-13.
Singh, S. P., Dhyani, B. P., Shahi, U. P., Kumar, A., Singh, R. R., Kumar, Y., Kumar, S.,  & Baliyan, S. V. (2009). Impact of integrated nutrient management on yield of rice (Oryza sativa) and wheat (Triticum aestivum) under rice-wheat cropping system in sandy loam soil. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 79(1), 65-69.
Stanford, G., & English, L. (1949). Use of flame photometer in rapid soil test for K and Ca. Agron. J., 41, 446.
Subbiah, B.V., & Asija, G. L. (1956). A rapid procedure for estimation of available nitrogen in soils. Curr. Sci., 25, 259-260.
Swain, D. K., Murmu, K., & Ghosh, B. C. (2013). Comparative assessment of conventional and organic nutrient management on crop growth and yield and soil fertility in tomato-sweet corn production system.  Australian J. Crop Sci., 7(11), 1617-1626.
Tabatabai, M. A. (1982). Soil enzymes. In: Methods of analysis, Page et al., (eds) Part II, Second Edition. pp. 903-947.
Venkatesh, S., Sanjay, R., & Shekhar, J. C. (2003). Sweet corn. Specialty corn Technical Series 1, Directorate of Maize Research, New Delhi, pp. 1-3.
Vilasitha, G., Selvaraj, S., & Basavaraj, B. (2013). Studies on release of different nitrogen forms specifically NO3-, NH4+, available N and fertility status in soil relating to soil fertility ratings in maize (Zea mays L.) cultivation. Indian Agriculturalist, 57(2), 85-90.
Walkley, A., & Black, C. A. (1934). An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci., 40, 233-243.
Yadav, B. K., & Lourduraj, A. C. (2007). Effect of organic manures applied to rice crop on microbial population and enzyme activity in post harvest soil. J. Ecobiol., 20(2), 139-144.

 

 

 


 




Photo

Photo