Rajasthan-324009 India
+91 9784677044
editor@ijpab.com
Indian Journal of Pure & Applied Biosciences (IJPAB)
Year : 2016 , Volume 4, Issue 5
Page No. : 249-254
Article doi: : http://dx.doi.org/10.18782/2320-7051.2016b
Impact of Pre Harvest Burning in Sugacane
Ch. Mukunda Rao*, K. Prasada Rao and K. Veerabhadra Rao
Acharya N. G. Ranga Agricultural University Regional Agricultural Research Station, Anakapalle – 531 001 (AP), India
*Corresponding Author E-mail: cmukundarao@yahoo.co.in
Received: 9.09.2016 | Revised: 13.10.2016 | Accepted: 22.10.2016
ABSTRACT
Sugarcane is one of the important commercial crops of India.Now a days due to scarcity of labour and increased cost of cultivation sugarcane cultivation is under doldrums. Under scarcity of labour pre-harvest burning and crushing of cane is a practice in overseas. Loss of cane in terms of cane weight and quality was more in brunt cane as harvesting delays after burning. The loss in cane weight and quality was less within 24 hours after burning. Cane quality in terms of reducing sugar percentage, dextrans contain in cane was high in burnt cane than unburnt cane. Loss in cane weight within 24 hours after burring was 4.5% and it raised up to 17.35% at 96 hours after burning. Burning of cane drastically reduces Juice extraction percentage up to 44. 23% at 96 hours ager burning. Juice pH was more acidic in burnt cane that Unburnt cane. Burning of cane reduces sucrose Percent 8.73% with in 24 hours and it was rises up 24.66 % at 96 hours after burning. Intentional burning of cane as a means of cost of harvest is not advisable because of lose in cane quality and quantity, environmental problems, additional cost in harvesting charges and differential cropping patterns of farming community etc.
Keywords: Pre harvest burning, Juice quality, Dextran, T A I (Titreble acidity index), C C S yield.
Full Text : PDF; Journal doi : http://dx.doi.org/10.18782/2320-7051.2016b
Cite this article:
Rao, Ch.M., Rao, K.P. and Rao, K.V, Impact of Pre Harvest Burning in Sugacane, Int. J. Pure App. Biosci. 4(5): 249-254 (2016). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18782/2320-7051.2016b
